Capabilities

What we ship,
and what it changes.

A selection of engagement archetypes — anonymized so we can be specific about architecture and outcomes without compromising client confidentiality.

Selected Engagements
01
Agentic Workflows

Back-office automation at audit-grade reliability

Problem

A regulated services firm spent thousands of analyst hours per month reconciling data across legacy systems — error-prone, slow, and impossible to scale.

Approach

We deployed a workflow agent grounded in the firm's source-of-truth systems, with deterministic verification steps, full action logs, and a human-in-the-loop checkpoint for material exceptions.

Outcome
  • Throughput per analyst lifted significantly
  • Every action replayable and auditable
  • Exception rate reduced and trended week-over-week
02
Multi-Agent Systems

Research, draft, and review pod for technical content

Problem

An R&D-heavy organization needed to convert a backlog of internal research into customer-ready technical material without diluting accuracy.

Approach

We architected a multi-agent pod — researcher, drafter, reviewer, and citation-checker — coordinated by a supervisor with explicit role contracts and a shared evidence store.

Outcome
  • Lead time from research to publication compressed
  • Citation integrity validated automatically
  • Subject-matter experts shifted from drafting to review
03
Physical Robotics

Vision-guided handling for variable, unstructured items

Problem

A facilities operator needed to manipulate a long tail of items that defeated rule-based vision and traditional pick-and-place programming.

Approach

We built a perception stack combining classical CV with learned grasp prediction, validated in simulation, and deployed it with safe-fallback behaviors and an in-line data flywheel.

Outcome
  • Coverage extended to previously unhandled SKUs
  • Cycle time held within operational targets
  • Continuous improvement loop now owned by client team
04
Advisory

Independent audit of an in-flight agent platform

Problem

A scale-up was building an internal agent platform and needed a candid technical assessment before committing to a multi-quarter roadmap.

Approach

Two-week deep dive: architecture review, eval coverage analysis, on-call interviews, and a written report with prioritized recommendations and a phased remediation plan.

Outcome
  • Clear buy/build/refactor decisions on every subsystem
  • Eval debt quantified and scheduled
  • Roadmap re-baselined against realistic risk

See an archetype that resembles your problem?